- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Vibromax 605PD
Ingersoll Rand SD200F vs. Vibromax 605PD
5 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD200F:
Sizes
| Clearance | 584 mm and 380 mm | 35 % more or 204 mm |
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 359 kN and 128 kN | 64 % more or 231 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 257 l. and 230 l. | 11 % more or 27 l. |
| Maximum speed | 12.6 km/h and 11.6 km/h | 8 % more or 1.0 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 152.9 kW and 56.7 kW | 63 % more or 96.2 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm and 3020 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3215 mm and 2610 mm |
Roller
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 20.8 Hz and 29 Hz |
| Roller width | 2134 mm and 1750 mm |
| Oscillation frequency 2 | 28.3 Hz and 36 Hz |
| Roller diameter | 1621 mm and 1100 mm |
| Pads number | 136 and 96 |
| Pad height | 127 mm and 100 mm |
| Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 11290.3 mm2 |
Operation
| Tyre | 23.1x26-10PR R1 and 14.9x24 6PR |
| Working weight | 20181 kg and 6792.5 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSB5.9-TAA and 4B3.9C |
Images
Sizes
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3020 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3215 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2610 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 584 mm | 5. Clearance | 380 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1621 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1100 mm |