- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand SD77F vs. Vibromax 1105PD
Ingersoll Rand SD77F vs. Vibromax 1105PD
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD77F:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.6 mm | 20 % more or 0.4 mm |
| High centrifugal force | 133 kN and 131 kN | 2 % more or 2 kN |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 15.3 km/h and 12.7 km/h | 17 % more or 2.6 km/h |
1 reasons to buy Vibromax 1105PD:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 397 l. and 178 l. | 55 % more or 219 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2955 mm and 3255 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2677 mm and 2965 mm |
| Overall length without blade | 5044 mm and 5890 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 1676 mm and 2100 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1219 mm and 1400 mm |
| Pads number | 84 and 132 |
| Pad height | 76 mm and 100 mm |
| Pad surface area | 13548.4 mm2 and 15548.4 mm2 |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 20.4 Hz and 29 Hz |
| Oscillation frequency 2 | 33.8 Hz and 35 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 8064.9 kg and 13325 kg |
| Tyre | 14.9x24 -6PR R1 and 23.1x20-26 8PR |
Motor
| Model | B4.5T 2 level and 6BT5.9C |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 5044 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5890 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2955 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3255 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2677 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2965 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1219 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1400 mm |