- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Rammax RW1800SPT vs. Caterpillar CP663E
Rammax RW1800SPT vs. Caterpillar CP663E
1 reasons to buy Rammax RW1800SPT:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 138 l. and 80 l. | 42 % more or 58 l. |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar CP663E:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 1.8 mm and 1.6 mm | 11 % more or 0.2 mm |
| High centrifugal force | 332 kN and 64 kN | 81 % more or 268 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 35 l. | 88 % more or 265 l. |
| Maximum speed | 11.4 km/h and 7 km/h | 39 % more or 4.4 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 129 kW and 19.9 kW | 85 % more or 109.1 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Between tyres width | 1400 mm and 2370 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2265 mm and 3100 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 900 mm and 2134 mm |
| Roller diameter | 790 mm and 1295 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 34 Hz and 30 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 2100 kg and 16800 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Kubota and Caterpillar |
| Model | D1403 and 3056E |
Images
Sizes
| 2. Between tyres width | 1400 mm | 2. Between tyres width | 2370 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2265 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3100 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 790 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1295 mm |