- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Vibromax 1805PD vs. Ingersoll Rand SD160F
Vibromax 1805PD vs. Ingersoll Rand SD160F
3 reasons to buy Vibromax 1805PD:
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.7 mm | 15 % more or 0.3 mm |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 397 l. and 257 l. | 35 % more or 140 l. |
Motor
Full power | 138 kW and 129 kW | 7 % more or 9 kW |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD160F:
Sizes
Clearance | 635 mm and 460 mm | 28 % more or 175 mm |
Roller
High centrifugal force | 339 kN and 205 kN | 40 % more or 134 kN |
Operation
Maximum speed | 12.7 km/h and 11.8 km/h | 7 % more or 0.9 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Overall length without blade | 5890 mm and 5994 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 3255 mm and 3180 mm |
Wheelbase | 2965 mm and 3099 mm |
Roller
Pad height | 100 mm and 127 mm |
Pad surface area | 15548.4 mm2 and 13548.4 mm2 |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 29 Hz and 20.8 Hz |
Oscillation frequency 2 | 35 Hz and 37.5 Hz |
Roller width | 2100 mm and 2134 mm |
Roller diameter | 1400 mm and 1499 mm |
Pads number | 132 and 120 |
Operation
Working weight | 18600 kg and 16508 kg |
Tyre | 23.1x20-26 8PR and 23.1x26-8PR R1 |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | 6BT5.9C and B5.9-TAA |
Images
Sizes
1. Overall length without blade | 5890 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5994 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 3255 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 2965 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3099 mm |
5. Clearance | 460 mm | 5. Clearance | 635 mm |
Roller
6. Roller diameter | 1400 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1499 mm |