- Home/
- Comparison/
- Vibratory Packer Roller/
- Vibromax 605PD vs. Ingersoll Rand SD77F
Vibromax 605PD vs. Ingersoll Rand SD77F
1 reasons to buy Vibromax 605PD:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 230 l. and 178 l. | 23 % more or 52 l. |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD77F:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.9 mm | 5 % more or 0.1 mm |
| High centrifugal force | 133 kN and 128 kN | 4 % more or 5 kN |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 15.3 km/h and 11.6 km/h | 24 % more or 3.7 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3020 mm and 2955 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2610 mm and 2677 mm |
| Overall length without blade | 4770 mm and 5044 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 1750 mm and 1676 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1100 mm and 1219 mm |
| Pads number | 96 and 84 |
| Pad height | 100 mm and 76 mm |
| Pad surface area | 11290.3 mm2 and 13548.4 mm2 |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 29 Hz and 20.4 Hz |
| Oscillation frequency 2 | 36 Hz and 33.8 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 6792.5 kg and 8064.9 kg |
| Tyre | 14.9x24 6PR and 14.9x24 -6PR R1 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | 4B3.9C and B4.5T 2 level |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Overall length without blade | 4770 mm | 1. Overall length without blade | 5044 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3020 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2955 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2610 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2677 mm |
Roller
| 6. Roller diameter | 1100 mm | 6. Roller diameter | 1219 mm |