- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Bomag BW190AD4HF vs. Dynapac CA134D
Bomag BW190AD4HF vs. Dynapac CA134D
5 reasons to buy Bomag BW190AD4HF:
Sizes
| Clearance | 350 mm and 243 mm | 31 % more or 107 mm |
Roller
| Average centrifugal force | 182 kN and 89 kN | 51 % more or 93 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 200 l. and 117 l. | 41 % more or 83 l. |
| Maximum speed | 11.3 km/h and 6 km/h | 47 % more or 5.3 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 99.9 kW and 62 kW | 38 % more or 37.9 kW |
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CA134D:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2800 rev / min and 2300 rev / min | 18 % more or 500 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 4520 mm and 3958 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3000 mm and 2507 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3300 mm and 1859 mm |
Roller
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 48 Hz and 35 Hz |
| Roller width | 2000 mm and 1370 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1220 mm and 1000 mm |
| Static line-distributed load | 28.8 kg/cm and 13 kg/cm |
Operation
| Working weight | 11800.2 kg and 4550 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and John Deere |
| Model | TCD 2012 L04 and e 5030 TF270 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4520 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 3958 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3000 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2507 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3300 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1859 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 350 mm | 5. Clearance | 243 mm |