- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Bomag BW278 vs. Dynapac CC232HF
Bomag BW278 vs. Dynapac CC232HF
6 reasons to buy Bomag BW278:
Sizes
Clearance | 381 mm and 270 mm | 29 % more or 111 mm |
Roller
High centrifugal force | 135 kN and 78 kN | 42 % more or 57 kN |
Low centrifugal force | 164.9 kN and 68 kN | 59 % more or 96.9 kN |
Operation
Maximum speed | 16.1 km/h and 13 km/h | 19 % more or 3.1 km/h |
Fuel Capacity | 227 l. and 120 l. | 47 % more or 107 l. |
Motor
Full power | 97 kW and 60 kW | 38 % more or 37 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 5080 mm and 4300 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2667 mm and 2920 mm |
Wheelbase | 3048 mm and 3180 mm |
Roller
Roller width | 1981 mm and 1575 mm |
Roller diameter | 1219 mm and 1120 mm |
Vibrations frequency 2 | 63 Hz and 71 Hz |
Static line-distributed load | 68 kg/cm and 29.2 kg/cm |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 57 Hz and 51 Hz |
Operation
Working weight | 9865.6 kg and 8400 kg |
Motor
Manufacturer | Cummins and Deutz |
Model | 4B3.9 QSB-C130 and BF4L 2011 |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 5080 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4300 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2667 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2920 mm |
4. Wheelbase | 3048 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3180 mm |
5. Clearance | 381 mm | 5. Clearance | 270 mm |