- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Bomag BW278AD4 vs. Ingersoll Rand DD132HF
Bomag BW278AD4 vs. Ingersoll Rand DD132HF
1 reasons to buy Bomag BW278AD4:
Operation
| Maximum speed | 16.1 km/h and 9.9 km/h | 39 % more or 6.2 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD132HF:
Sizes
| Clearance | 510 mm and 381 mm | 25 % more or 129 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 259 l. and 227 l. | 12 % more or 32 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 116 kW and 96.9 kW | 16 % more or 19.1 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5080 mm and 5995 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2819 mm and 3180 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3048 mm and 3550 mm |
Roller
| Roller diameter | 1219 mm and 1400 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 67 Hz and 45 Hz |
| Vibrations frequency 2 | 57 Hz and 66.7 Hz |
| Roller width | 1981 mm and 2135 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 11702.7 kg and 13750 kg |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSB4.5 and QSB5.9-155 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5080 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5995 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2819 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3048 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3550 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 381 mm | 5. Clearance | 510 mm |