- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Case SV210 vs. Ingersoll Rand DD112HF
Case SV210 vs. Ingersoll Rand DD112HF
2 reasons to buy Case SV210:
Roller
| Low centrifugal force | 160 kN and 147.2 kN | 8 % more or 12.8 kN |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 11 km/h and 10.6 km/h | 4 % more or 0.4 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD112HF:
Sizes
| Clearance | 510 mm and 380 mm | 25 % more or 130 mm |
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 187.1 kN and 145 kN | 23 % more or 42.1 kN |
| Low nominal amplitude | 4200 mm and 1.9 mm | 100 % more or 4198.1 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Wheelbase | 2600 mm and 3550 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5200 mm and 5995 mm |
| Overall width | 1930 mm and 2210 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2900 mm and 3160 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 1700 mm and 2000 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1300 mm and 1400 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 40 Hz and 50 Hz |
| Vibrations frequency 2 | 30 Hz and 70 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 8820 kg and 12360 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | 2 level B4.5-C99 and B3.9-C125 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5200 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5995 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1930 mm | 2. Overall width | 2210 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2900 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3160 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2600 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3550 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 380 mm | 5. Clearance | 510 mm |