- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CA252D vs. Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA
Dynapac CA252D vs. Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CA252D:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 246 kN and 199.8 kN | 19 % more or 46.2 kN |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA:
Roller
| Low centrifugal force | 170.3 kN and 119 kN | 30 % more or 51.3 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 257.4 l. and 250 l. | 3 % more or 7.4 l. |
| Maximum speed | 10.6 km/h and 9 km/h | 15 % more or 1.6 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5550 mm and 6195 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2972 mm and 3200 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2130 mm and 2135 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1523 mm and 1500 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 33 Hz and 41.7 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 10440 kg and 15333 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSB 4.5 and QSB 5.9-C |
| Aspiration | water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling and 6 cylinder engine with turbocharging and charge air cooling |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5550 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 6195 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2972 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3200 mm |