- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CA260D vs. Ingersoll Rand DD29
Dynapac CA260D vs. Ingersoll Rand DD29
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CA260D:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 320 l. and 68.1 l. | 79 % more or 251.9 l. |
1 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD29:
Operation
| Maximum speed | 10.6 km/h and 9 km/h | 15 % more or 1.6 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5758 mm and 2556 mm |
| Overall width | 2130 mm and 1363 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2952 mm and 2525 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2870 mm and 1725 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2130 mm and 1250 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1523 mm and 732 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 33 Hz and 66.7 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 11300 kg and 2873.5 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Kubota |
| Model | QSB 6.7 and V2203M |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5758 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 2556 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2130 mm | 2. Overall width | 1363 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2952 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2525 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2870 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1725 mm |