- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CA262D vs. Dynapac CC900S
Dynapac CA262D vs. Dynapac CC900S
5 reasons to buy Dynapac CA262D:
Sizes
| Clearance | 400 mm and 250 mm | 37 % more or 150 mm |
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 246 kN and 17 kN | 93 % more or 229 kN |
| Low centrifugal force | 119 kN and 11.2 kN | 91 % more or 107.8 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 320 l. and 23 l. | 93 % more or 297 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 112 kW and 17 kW | 85 % more or 95 kW |
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CC900S:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2600 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 15 % more or 400 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5758 mm and 2095 mm |
| Overall width | 2130 mm and 900 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2974 mm and 2500 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2879 mm and 1350 mm |
Roller
| Static line-distributed load | 26.3 kg/cm and 9.4 kg/cm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 33 Hz and 56 Hz |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 9 km/h and 9 km/h |
| Working weight | 10700 kg and 1640 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Perkins |
| Model | QSB 6.7 T3 and 403D-11 |
| Aspiration | water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling and water cooling |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5758 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 2095 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2130 mm | 2. Overall width | 900 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2974 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2500 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2879 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 1350 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 400 mm | 5. Clearance | 250 mm |