- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CA280D vs. Ingersoll Rand SD160DX
Dynapac CA280D vs. Ingersoll Rand SD160DX
5 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD160DX:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 339 kN and 246 kN | 27 % more or 93 kN |
| Low centrifugal force | 264 kN and 119 kN | 55 % more or 145 kN |
| High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.7 mm | 15 % more or 0.3 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 257.4 l. and 250 l. | 3 % more or 7.4 l. |
| Maximum speed | 12.5 km/h and 5 km/h | 60 % more or 7.5 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5550 mm and 5998 mm |
| Overall width | 2130 mm and 2406 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2952 mm and 3116 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2879 mm and 3109 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2130 mm and 2134 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1523 mm and 1600 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 33 Hz and 33.8 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 12500 kg and 15966.5 kg |
| Tyres (if applicable) | 23.1x26 and 23.1x26-8PR R3 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSB 4.5 and B5.9-TAA |
| Aspiration | water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5550 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5998 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2130 mm | 2. Overall width | 2406 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2952 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3116 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2879 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3109 mm |