- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CA300D vs. Bomag BW278
Dynapac CA300D vs. Bomag BW278
3 reasons to buy Dynapac CA300D:
Sizes
| Clearance | 400 mm and 381 mm | 5 % more or 19 mm |
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 300 kN and 135 kN | 55 % more or 165 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 227 l. | 9 % more or 23 l. |
3 reasons to buy Bomag BW278:
Roller
| Low centrifugal force | 164.9 kN and 146 kN | 11 % more or 18.9 kN |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 16.1 km/h and 5 km/h | 69 % more or 11.1 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 97 kW and 82 kW | 15 % more or 15 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2972 mm and 2667 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2879 mm and 3048 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5550 mm and 5080 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2130 mm and 1981 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1543 mm and 1219 mm |
| Static line-distributed load | 38 kg/cm and 68 kg/cm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 33 Hz and 57 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 12550 kg and 9865.6 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | 4A BT3.9-C and 4B3.9 QSB-C130 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5550 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5080 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2972 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2667 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2879 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3048 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 400 mm | 5. Clearance | 381 mm |