- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CA702D vs. Dynapac CA602D
Dynapac CA702D vs. Dynapac CA602D
5 reasons to buy Dynapac CA702D:
Roller
| Low centrifugal force | 254 kN and 231 kN | 9 % more or 23 kN |
| High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.8 mm | 10 % more or 0.2 mm |
| High centrifugal force | 330 kN and 317 kN | 4 % more or 13 kN |
| Low nominal amplitude | 1.3 mm and 1.1 mm | 15 % more or 0.2 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 164 kW and 142 kW | 13 % more or 22 kW |
2 reasons to buy Dynapac CA602D:
Sizes
| Clearance | 450 mm and 405 mm | 10 % more or 45 mm |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 11 km/h and 8 km/h | 27 % more or 3 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 6535 mm and 6000 mm |
| Overall width | 2280 mm and 2130 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2982 mm and 2972 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3341 mm and 2992 mm |
Roller
| Roller diameter | 1700 mm and 1573 mm |
| Static line-distributed load | 80.8 kg/cm and 59.6 kg/cm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 28 Hz and 29 Hz |
| Vibrations frequency 2 | 30 Hz and 31 Hz |
| Roller width | 2130 mm and 2130 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 26900 kg and 18600 kg |
| Fuel Capacity | 320 l. and 320 l. |
| Tyres (if applicable) | 23.1x26 and 23.1x26 |
Motor
| Model | QSB 6.7 T3 and QSB 6.7 T3 |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2200 rev / min |
| Aspiration | water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling and water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 6535 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 6000 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2280 mm | 2. Overall width | 2130 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2982 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2972 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3341 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2992 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 405 mm | 5. Clearance | 450 mm |