- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CC102C vs. Bomag BW213D4
Dynapac CC102C vs. Bomag BW213D4
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CC102C:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2800 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 21 % more or 600 rev |
5 reasons to buy Bomag BW213D4:
Sizes
| Clearance | 490 mm and 175 mm | 64 % more or 315 mm |
Roller
| Average centrifugal force | 202 kN and 23 kN | 89 % more or 179 kN |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 11 km/h and 7 km/h | 36 % more or 4 km/h |
| Fuel Capacity | 340 l. and 50 l. | 85 % more or 290 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 99.2 kW and 23 kW | 77 % more or 76.2 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2640 mm and 2972 mm |
| Wheelbase | 1715 mm and 2960 mm |
| Dimensional length | 2450 mm and 5808 mm |
Roller
| Static line-distributed load | 10.6 kg/cm and 33.3 kg/cm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 57 Hz and 30 Hz |
Operation
| Tyres (if applicable) | 640x240-15 and 23.1-26/12PR |
| Working weight | 2300 kg and 12298.2 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Deutz |
| Model | D2011 L02 I and BF4M2012C |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 2450 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5808 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2640 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2972 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 1715 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2960 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 175 mm | 5. Clearance | 490 mm |