- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CC232CHF vs. Bomag BW278
Dynapac CC232CHF vs. Bomag BW278
5 reasons to buy Bomag BW278:
Sizes
| Clearance | 381 mm and 270 mm | 29 % more or 111 mm |
Roller
| Low centrifugal force | 164.9 kN and 68 kN | 59 % more or 96.9 kN |
| High centrifugal force | 135 kN and 78 kN | 42 % more or 57 kN |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 16.1 km/h and 11 km/h | 32 % more or 5.1 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 97 kW and 60 kW | 38 % more or 37 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2920 mm and 2667 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3180 mm and 3048 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4300 mm and 5080 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 1450 mm and 1981 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1120 mm and 1219 mm |
| Static line-distributed load | 31.5 kg/cm and 68 kg/cm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 54 Hz and 57 Hz |
| Vibrations frequency 2 | 71 Hz and 63 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 7580 kg and 9865.6 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
| Model | BF4L 2011 and 4B3.9 QSB-C130 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4300 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5080 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2920 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2667 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3180 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3048 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 270 mm | 5. Clearance | 381 mm |