- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CC722 vs. Bomag BW278
Dynapac CC722 vs. Bomag BW278
4 reasons to buy Dynapac CC722:
Sizes
| Clearance | 400 mm and 381 mm | 5 % more or 19 mm |
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 215 kN and 135 kN | 37 % more or 80 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 335 l. and 227 l. | 32 % more or 108 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 170 kW and 97 kW | 43 % more or 73 kW |
2 reasons to buy Bomag BW278:
Roller
| Low centrifugal force | 164.9 kN and 102 kN | 38 % more or 62.9 kN |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 16.1 km/h and 11 km/h | 32 % more or 5.1 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5653 mm and 5080 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3430 mm and 2667 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3754 mm and 3048 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2130 mm and 1981 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1527 mm and 1219 mm |
| Static line-distributed load | 40 kg/cm and 68 kg/cm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 48 Hz and 57 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 16775 kg and 9865.6 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSB 6.7 T3 and 4B3.9 QSB-C130 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5653 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5080 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3430 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2667 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3754 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3048 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 400 mm | 5. Clearance | 381 mm |