- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CC722 vs. Caterpillar CB634D
Dynapac CC722 vs. Caterpillar CB634D
4 reasons to buy Dynapac CC722:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 215 kN and 159 kN | 26 % more or 56 kN |
| Low centrifugal force | 102 kN and 58 kN | 43 % more or 44 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 335 l. and 250 l. | 25 % more or 85 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 170 kW and 108 kW | 36 % more or 62 kW |
1 reasons to buy Caterpillar CB634D:
Operation
| Maximum speed | 12.2 km/h and 11 km/h | 10 % more or 1.2 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 3430 mm and 3113 mm |
| Overall width | 2354 mm and 2311 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3754 mm and 3150 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5653 mm and 4953 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2130 mm and 2130 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1527 mm and 1300 mm |
| Static line-distributed load | 40 kg/cm and 30 kg/cm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 48 Hz and 44 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 16775 kg and 12800 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | QSB 6.7 T3 and 3116T |
| Aspiration | water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5653 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4953 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2354 mm | 2. Overall width | 2311 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3430 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3113 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3754 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3150 mm |