- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CC722 vs. Vibromax VM116D
Dynapac CC722 vs. Vibromax VM116D
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CC722:
Motor
| Full power | 170 kW and 112 kW | 34 % more or 58 kW |
4 reasons to buy Vibromax VM116D:
Sizes
| Clearance | 447 mm and 400 mm | 11 % more or 47 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 400 l. and 335 l. | 16 % more or 65 l. |
| Maximum speed | 12.7 km/h and 11 km/h | 13 % more or 1.7 km/h |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5653 mm and 5722 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3430 mm and 2935 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3754 mm and 2996 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2130 mm and 2100 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1527 mm and 1500 mm |
| Static line-distributed load | 40 kg/cm and 34.8 kg/cm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 48 Hz and 29 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 16775 kg and 13000 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | QSB 6.7 T3 and B 5.9-150 C |
| Aspiration | water cooled turbo diesel with subsequent cooling and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5653 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5722 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3430 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2935 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3754 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2996 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 400 mm | 5. Clearance | 447 mm |