- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Dynapac CG333HF vs. Caterpillar CB634D
Dynapac CG333HF vs. Caterpillar CB634D
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CG333HF:
Roller
| Low centrifugal force | 60 kN and 58 kN | 3 % more or 2 kN |
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar CB634D:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 159 kN and 82 kN | 48 % more or 77 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 250 l. and 100 l. | 60 % more or 150 l. |
| Maximum speed | 12.2 km/h and 12 km/h | 2 % more or 0.2 km/h |
Motor
| Full power | 108 kW and 62 kW | 43 % more or 46 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm and 3113 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4070 mm and 4953 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2950 mm and 3150 mm |
| Overall width | 1805 mm and 2311 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 1680 mm and 2130 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1120 mm and 1300 mm |
| Static line-distributed load | 25.6 kg/cm and 30 kg/cm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 54 Hz and 44 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 8600 kg and 12800 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Caterpillar |
| Model | BF4M 2011 and 3116T |
| Aspiration | diesel engine with air cooling and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 4070 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4953 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 1805 mm | 2. Overall width | 2311 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2950 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3113 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2950 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3150 mm |