- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Hamm 3518 vs. Dynapac CA262D
Hamm 3518 vs. Dynapac CA262D
4 reasons to buy Hamm 3518:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 2 mm and 1.7 mm | 15 % more or 0.3 mm |
| High centrifugal force | 330 kN and 246 kN | 25 % more or 84 kN |
| Low centrifugal force | 330 kN and 119 kN | 64 % more or 211 kN |
Motor
| Full power | 147 kW and 112 kW | 24 % more or 35 kW |
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CA262D:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 320 l. and 300 l. | 6 % more or 20 l. |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 6210 mm and 5758 mm |
| Overall width | 2390 mm and 2130 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2990 mm and 2974 mm |
Roller
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 30 Hz and 33 Hz |
| Roller width | 2220 mm and 2130 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 17820 kg and 10700 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Deutz and Cummins |
| Model | BF6M2012C and QSB 6.7 T3 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 6210 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5758 mm |
| 2. Overall width | 2390 mm | 2. Overall width | 2130 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2990 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2974 mm |