- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Hypac C835D vs. Ingersoll Rand DD132HF
Hypac C835D vs. Ingersoll Rand DD132HF
1 reasons to buy Hypac C835D:
Operation
| Maximum speed | 13 km/h and 9.9 km/h | 24 % more or 3.1 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD132HF:
Sizes
| Clearance | 510 mm and 375 mm | 26 % more or 135 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 259 l. and 150 l. | 42 % more or 109 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 116 kW and 82 kW | 29 % more or 34 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2860 mm and 3180 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2500 mm and 3550 mm |
| Dimensional length | 4913 mm and 5995 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 1686 mm and 2135 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1228 mm and 1400 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 30 Hz and 45 Hz |
| Vibrations frequency 2 | 40 Hz and 66.7 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 7094.2 kg and 13750 kg |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Model | QSB3.3 and QSB5.9-155 |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 2500 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3550 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 375 mm | 5. Clearance | 510 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 4913 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5995 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2860 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm |