- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand DD112HF vs. Vibromax VM66D
Ingersoll Rand DD112HF vs. Vibromax VM66D
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD112HF:
Sizes
| Clearance | 510 mm and 389 mm | 24 % more or 121 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 93.2 kW and 60 kW | 36 % more or 33.2 kW |
1 reasons to buy Vibromax VM66D:
Operation
| Maximum speed | 11 km/h and 10.6 km/h | 4 % more or 0.4 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5995 mm and 4887 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3160 mm and 2845 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3550 mm and 2514 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2000 mm and 1750 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1400 mm and 1220 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 50 Hz and 29 Hz |
| Vibrations frequency 2 | 70 Hz and 36 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 12360 kg and 7300 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | B3.9-C125 and B 3.3 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5995 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4887 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3160 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2845 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3550 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 2514 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 510 mm | 5. Clearance | 389 mm |