- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand DD138HFA vs. Bomag BW278
Ingersoll Rand DD138HFA vs. Bomag BW278
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD138HFA:
Roller
| High centrifugal force | 185.5 kN and 135 kN | 27 % more or 50.5 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 259 l. and 227 l. | 12 % more or 32 l. |
2 reasons to buy Bomag BW278:
Roller
| Low centrifugal force | 164.9 kN and 163.2 kN | 1 % more or 1.7 kN |
Operation
| Maximum speed | 16.1 km/h and 10.6 km/h | 34 % more or 5.5 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5995 mm and 5080 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm and 2667 mm |
Roller
| Vibrations frequency 2 | 66.7 Hz and 63 Hz |
| Roller width | 2135 mm and 1981 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1400 mm and 1219 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 45 Hz and 57 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 13750 kg and 9865.6 kg |
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | B5.9-173 and 4B3.9 QSB-C130 |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5995 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5080 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2667 mm |