- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand DD90 vs. Caterpillar CS683E
Ingersoll Rand DD90 vs. Caterpillar CS683E
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD90:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 133 l. and 80 l. | 40 % more or 53 l. |
| Maximum speed | 11.8 km/h and 11.3 km/h | 4 % more or 0.5 km/h |
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 55 amperes | 42 % more or 40 amperes |
5 reasons to buy Caterpillar CS683E:
Roller
| High nominal amplitude | 1.8 mm and 1 mm | 44 % more or 0.8 mm |
| High centrifugal force | 332 kN and 115.6 kN | 65 % more or 216.4 kN |
| Low centrifugal force | 166 kN and 26 kN | 84 % more or 140 kN |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 170 l. | 43 % more or 130 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 123 kW and 82 kW | 33 % more or 41 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2845 mm and 3020 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5085 mm and 6000 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 1675 mm and 2134 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1220 mm and 1524 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 41.7 Hz and 30 Hz |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 24 V |
| Working weight | 9895 kg and 18800 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Caterpillar |
| Model | B3.9-C and 3056E |
| Aspiration | Turbocharger and 4 cylinders and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5085 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 6000 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2845 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3020 mm |