- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Ingersoll Rand DD90 vs. Dynapac CA152
Ingersoll Rand DD90 vs. Dynapac CA152
1 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD90:
Roller
High centrifugal force | 115.6 kN and 114 kN | 1 % more or 1.6 kN |
4 reasons to buy Dynapac CA152:
Roller
High nominal amplitude | 1.7 mm and 1 mm | 41 % more or 0.7 mm |
Low centrifugal force | 109 kN and 26 kN | 76 % more or 83 kN |
Operation
Fuel Capacity | 225 l. and 170 l. | 24 % more or 55 l. |
Maximum speed | 19 km/h and 11.8 km/h | 38 % more or 7.2 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
Dimensional length | 5085 mm and 4776 mm |
Height to cab upper part | 2845 mm and 2835 mm |
Roller
Roller diameter | 1220 mm and 1219 mm |
Vibrations frequency 1 | 41.7 Hz and 31 Hz |
Vibrations frequency 2 | 30.8 Hz and 43 Hz |
Roller width | 1675 mm and 1676 mm |
Operation
Working weight | 9895 kg and 7250 kg |
Motor
Aspiration | Turbocharger and 4 cylinders and water cooling turbodiesel |
Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
Model | B3.9-C and B4.5 T |
Images
Sizes
1. Dimensional length | 5085 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4776 mm |
3. Height to cab upper part | 2845 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2835 mm |


