- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Vibromax VM106PD vs. Ingersoll Rand DD132HF
Vibromax VM106PD vs. Ingersoll Rand DD132HF
2 reasons to buy Vibromax VM106PD:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 259 l. | 14 % more or 41 l. |
| Maximum speed | 10.5 km/h and 9.9 km/h | 6 % more or 0.6 km/h |
3 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD132HF:
Sizes
| Clearance | 510 mm and 447 mm | 12 % more or 63 mm |
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 138 l. and 80 l. | 42 % more or 58 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 116 kW and 93 kW | 20 % more or 23 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Height to cab upper part | 2935 mm and 3180 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2846 mm and 3550 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5444 mm and 5995 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2100 mm and 2135 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1500 mm and 1400 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 31 Hz and 45 Hz |
| Vibrations frequency 2 | 36 Hz and 66.7 Hz |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
| Working weight | 11600 kg and 13750 kg |
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 95 amperes |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | B 3.9-125 C and QSB5.9-155 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbocharging |
Images
Sizes
| 5. Clearance | 447 mm | 5. Clearance | 510 mm |
| 1. Dimensional length | 5444 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 5995 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2935 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3180 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2846 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3550 mm |