- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Vibromax VM106PD vs. Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA
Vibromax VM106PD vs. Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA
1 reasons to buy Vibromax VM106PD:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 300 l. and 257.4 l. | 14 % more or 42.6 l. |
2 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand DD158HFA:
Operation
| Hydraulic system fluid volume | 132 l. and 80 l. | 39 % more or 52 l. |
| Maximum speed | 10.6 km/h and 10.5 km/h | 1 % more or 0.1 km/h |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5444 mm and 6195 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2935 mm and 3200 mm |
Roller
| Vibrations frequency 2 | 36 Hz and 56.7 Hz |
| Roller width | 2100 mm and 2135 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1500 mm and 1500 mm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 31 Hz and 41.7 Hz |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 12 V and 12 V |
| Generator current strength | 95 amperes and 95 amperes |
| Working weight | 11600 kg and 15333 kg |
Motor
| Aspiration | turbocharging and 6 cylinder engine with turbocharging and charge air cooling |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Cummins |
| Model | B 3.9-125 C and QSB 5.9-C |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5444 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 6195 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2935 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3200 mm |