- Home/
- Comparison/
- Smooth Drum Vibratory Roller/
- Vibromax VM116D vs. Dynapac CC322
Vibromax VM116D vs. Dynapac CC322
3 reasons to buy Vibromax VM116D:
Sizes
| Clearance | 447 mm and 270 mm | 40 % more or 177 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 400 l. and 120 l. | 70 % more or 280 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 112 kW and 60 kW | 46 % more or 52 kW |
2 reasons to buy Dynapac CC322:
Operation
| Maximum speed | 13 km/h and 12.7 km/h | 2 % more or 0.3 km/h |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2800 rev / min and 2200 rev / min | 21 % more or 600 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Sizes
| Dimensional length | 5722 mm and 4300 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 2935 mm and 2920 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2996 mm and 3180 mm |
Roller
| Roller width | 2100 mm and 1680 mm |
| Roller diameter | 1500 mm and 1120 mm |
| Static line-distributed load | 34.8 kg/cm and 24.4 kg/cm |
| Vibrations frequency 1 | 29 Hz and 51 Hz |
Operation
| Working weight | 13000 kg and 8100 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Deutz |
| Model | B 5.9-150 C and BF4L 2011 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and turbo diesel with air cooling |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Dimensional length | 5722 mm | 1. Dimensional length | 4300 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 2935 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 2920 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 2996 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3180 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 447 mm | 5. Clearance | 270 mm |