- Home/
- Comparison/
- Heavy Hauler/
- International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
1 reasons to buy International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004):
Motor
| Full power | 410.1 kW and 298.3 kW | 27 % more or 111.8 kW |
5 reasons to buy Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7200 mm and 7671.8 mm | 6 % less or 471.8 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 6900 mm and 7491 mm | 8 % less or 591 mm |
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
| Peak torque | 2000 Nm and 1965.9 Nm | 2 % more or 34.1 Nm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 12 and 11 | 8 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787.4 mm and 825 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 23400 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 4950.1 kg and 7780 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3657.6 mm and 4100 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5613.4 mm and 6285 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787 mm and 825 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 23400 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 4945.1 kg and 7690 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3556 mm and 3900 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5511.8 mm and 6085 mm |
Sizes
| Class by weight | 7 and 8 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Volvo |
| Model | C15 (550 HP) and D13A400 (400 HP) |
Gear box
| Model | FR-13210B 13-speeds and V2514 |
| Manufacturer | Eaton Fuller and Volvo |
Images