- Home/
- Comparison/
- Heavy Hauler/
- International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH 6x4 T-Riding (2005)
International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH 6x4 T-Riding (2005)
4 reasons to buy International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004):
Wheelbase specifications 3
| Turn radius | 8077.2 mm and 8300 mm | 3 % less or 222.8 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7671.8 mm and 7950 mm | 3 % less or 278.2 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 7491 mm and 7650 mm | 2 % less or 159 mm |
Motor
| Peak torque | 2237.1 Nm and 2200 Nm | 2 % more or 37.1 Nm |
3 reasons to buy Volvo FH 6x4 T-Riding (2005):
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
| Full power | 328.1 kW and 298.3 kW | 9 % more or 29.8 kW |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 12 and 11 | 8 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 3
| Wheelbase | 3911 mm and 3600 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5867.4 mm and 7137 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787.4 mm and 805 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 26000 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 4963.2 kg and 9260 kg |
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Chassis total weight | 4950.1 kg and 7240 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3657.6 mm and 3400 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5613.4 mm and 6937 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787.4 mm and 805 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 26000 kg |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Wheelbase | 3556 mm and 3200 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5511.8 mm and 6737 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787 mm and 805 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 26000 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 4945.1 kg and 9220 kg |
Sizes
| Class by weight | 7 and 8 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Volvo |
| Model | N14 (400 HP) and D13A520 (520 HP) |
Gear box
| Model | FR-13210B 11-speeds and V2514 |
| Manufacturer | Eaton Fuller and Volvo |
Images