- Home/
- Comparison/
- Heavy Hauler/
- International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
6 reasons to buy Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7450 mm and 7671.8 mm | 3 % less or 221.8 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 7200 mm and 7491 mm | 4 % less or 291 mm |
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
| Full power | 410.1 kW and 208.8 kW | 49 % more or 201.3 kW |
| Peak torque | 2500 Nm and 2237.1 Nm | 11 % more or 262.9 Nm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 12 and 10 | 17 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Wheelbase | 3657.6 mm and 3200 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5613.4 mm and 6735 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787.4 mm and 805 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 26000 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 4950.1 kg and 8580 kg |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 26000 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 4945.1 kg and 8570 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3556 mm and 3050 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5511.8 mm and 6585 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787 mm and 805 mm |
Sizes
| Class by weight | 7 and 8 |
Motor
| Model | C15 (435 HP) and D16C (610 HP) |
| Manufacturer | Cummins and Volvo |
Gear box
| Manufacturer | Eaton Fuller and Volvo |
| Model | FR-13210B 11-speeds and VO2814 |
Images