- Home/
- Comparison/
- Heavy Hauler/
- International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
2 reasons to buy International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004):
Motor
| Peak torque | 2508.3 Nm and 2500 Nm | 0 % more or 8.3 Nm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 18 and 12 | 33 % more or 6 |
4 reasons to buy Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7450 mm and 7671.8 mm | 3 % less or 221.8 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 7200 mm and 7491 mm | 4 % less or 291 mm |
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
| Full power | 410.1 kW and 391.5 kW | 5 % more or 18.6 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 26000 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 4950.1 kg and 8580 kg |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787.4 mm and 805 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3657.6 mm and 3200 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5613.4 mm and 6735 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Wheelbase | 3556 mm and 3050 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5511.8 mm and 6585 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787 mm and 805 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 26000 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 4945.1 kg and 8570 kg |
Sizes
| Class by weight | 7 and 8 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Volvo |
| Model | ISM (280 HP) and D16C (550 HP) |
Gear box
| Manufacturer | Eaton Fuller and Volvo |
| Model | FR-13210B 18-speeds and VO2814 |
Images