- Home/
- Comparison/
- Heavy Hauler/
- International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005)
6 reasons to buy Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 2
Turn radius | 7450 mm and 7671.8 mm | 3 % less or 221.8 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
Turn radius | 7200 mm and 7491 mm | 4 % less or 291 mm |
Sizes
Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
Peak torque | 2800 Nm and 1965.9 Nm | 30 % more or 834.1 Nm |
Full power | 410.1 kW and 249.8 kW | 39 % more or 160.3 kW |
Gear box
Forward gears number | 12 and 11 | 8 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 26000 kg |
Chassis total weight | 4950.1 kg and 8580 kg |
Wheelbase | 3657.6 mm and 3200 mm |
Dimensional length | 5613.4 mm and 6735 mm |
Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787.4 mm and 805 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 26000 kg |
Chassis total weight | 4945.1 kg and 8570 kg |
Wheelbase | 3556 mm and 3050 mm |
Dimensional length | 5511.8 mm and 6585 mm |
Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787 mm and 805 mm |
Sizes
Class by weight | 7 and 8 |
Motor
Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Volvo |
Model | C12 (335 HP) and D16C (610 HP) |
Gear box
Manufacturer | Eaton Fuller and Volvo |
Model | FR-13210B 13-speeds and VO2814 |
Images


