- Home/
- Comparison/
- Heavy Hauler/
- International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH16 6x4 T-Riding(2005)
International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004) vs. Volvo FH16 6x4 T-Riding(2005)
4 reasons to buy International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004):
Wheelbase specifications 3
| Turn radius | 8077.2 mm and 8800 mm | 8 % less or 722.8 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7671.8 mm and 7800 mm | 2 % less or 128.2 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 7491 mm and 7650 mm | 2 % less or 159 mm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 18 and 12 | 33 % more or 6 |
3 reasons to buy Volvo FH16 6x4 T-Riding(2005):
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
| Peak torque | 2500 Nm and 1694.8 Nm | 32 % more or 805.2 Nm |
| Full power | 410.1 kW and 391.5 kW | 5 % more or 18.6 kW |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 3
| Wheelbase | 3911 mm and 3600 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5867.4 mm and 7135 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787.4 mm and 805 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 26000 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 4963.2 kg and 9480 kg |
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 26000 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 4950.1 kg and 9450 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3657.6 mm and 3400 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5613.4 mm and 6935 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787.4 mm and 805 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Total gross vehicle weight | 14515 kg and 26000 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3556 mm and 3200 mm |
| Chassis total weight | 4945.1 kg and 9430 kg |
| Dimensional length | 5511.8 mm and 6735 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 787 mm and 805 mm |
Sizes
| Class by weight | 7 and 8 |
Motor
| Model | ISM (305 HP) and D16C (550 HP) |
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Volvo |
Gear box
| Manufacturer | Eaton Fuller and Volvo |
| Model | FR-13210B 18-speeds and VO2814 |
Images