- Home/
- Comparison/
- Heavy Hauler/
- Mercedes-Benz 2628LL Rear-Wheel Drive (2005) vs. Mack CV712 (2004)
Mercedes-Benz 2628LL Rear-Wheel Drive (2005) vs. Mack CV712 (2004)
2 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz 2628LL Rear-Wheel Drive (2005):
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
| Torque measured at | 1600 rev / min and 1300 rev / min | 19 % more or 300 rev |
4 reasons to buy Mack CV712 (2004):
Sizes
| Clearance | 481 mm and 250 mm | 48 % more or 231 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 242.4 kW and 208.1 kW | 14 % more or 34.3 kW |
| Peak torque | 1672 Nm and 1100 Nm | 34 % more or 572 Nm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 10 and 5 | 50 % more or 5 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 1200 mm and 1372 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3900 mm and 4140 mm |
| Chassis total weight | 7160 kg and 5081.1 kg |
| Dimensional length | 8300 mm and 6375 mm |
| Length from cab rear to frame end | 5990 mm and 3505 mm |
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 1 and 1 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Mack |
| Model | OM906LA (279 HP) and AMI-335 ASET IEGR |
Gear box
| Top gear ratio | 0.75 :1 and 0.64 :1 |
| Manufacturer | Allison and Mack |
| Low gear ratio | 3.5 :1 and 4.7 :1 |
| Model | WT-MD3060P 5-speeds and T310ME |
Images
Sizes
| 5. Clearance | 250 mm | 5. Clearance | 481 mm |