- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tipper/
- Mack CV513 (2004) vs. Mercedes-Benz 1622K (2005)
Mack CV513 (2004) vs. Mercedes-Benz 1622K (2005)
5 reasons to buy Mack CV513 (2004):
Sizes
| Clearance | 488 mm and 260 mm | 47 % more or 228 mm |
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
| Full power | 242.4 kW and 162.6 kW | 33 % more or 79.8 kW |
| Peak torque | 1672 Nm and 810 Nm | 52 % more or 862 Nm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 11 and 6 | 45 % more or 5 |
2 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz 1622K (2005):
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
| Torque measured at | 1600 rev / min and 1300 rev / min | 19 % more or 300 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Wheelbase | 6300 mm and 3260 mm |
| Dimensional length | 9811 mm and 6015 mm |
| Length from cab rear to frame end | 7087 mm and 4185 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 2794 mm and 1135 mm |
Motor
| Model | AI-300A ASET IEGR and OM924LA (218 HP) |
| Manufacturer | Mack and Mercedes-Benz |
Gear box
| Low gear ratio | 3.5 :1 and 6.7 :1 |
| Model | TM309 and G85-6 |
| Top gear ratio | 0.71 :1 and 0.73 :1 |
| Manufacturer | Allison and Mercedes-Benz |