- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tipper/
- Mack CV712 (2004) vs. Mercedes-Benz 2536L (2003)
Mack CV712 (2004) vs. Mercedes-Benz 2536L (2003)
4 reasons to buy Mack CV712 (2004):
Sizes
| Clearance | 481 mm and 200 mm | 58 % more or 281 mm |
Motor
| Power measured at | 2100 rev / min and 1800 rev / min | 14 % more or 300 rev |
| Full power | 272.2 kW and 268.5 kW | 1 % more or 3.7 kW |
| Torque measured at | 1300 rev / min and 1080 rev / min | 17 % more or 220 rev |
3 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz 2536L (2003):
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
| Peak torque | 1850 Nm and 1672 Nm | 10 % more or 178 Nm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 16 and 6 | 62 % more or 10 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Wheelbase | 4140 mm and 4800 mm |
| Dimensional length | 6375 mm and 10105 mm |
| Chassis total weight | 5081.1 kg and 7750 kg |
| Length from cab rear to frame end | 3505 mm and 7795 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 1372 mm and 2250 mm |
Motor
| Model | AMI-335 ASET IEGR and OM501LA (360 HP) |
| Manufacturer | Mack and Mercedes-Benz |
| Cylinder configuration | V-MAC III and V6 |
Gear box
| Model | T310M and G211-16 |
| Manufacturer | Fuller and Mercedes-Benz |
| Top gear ratio | 0.64 :1 and 0.83 :1 |
| Low gear ratio | 3.5 :1 and 14.2 :1 |