- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tipper/
- Mercedes-Benz 1618K (2005) vs. Mack CV712 (2004)
Mercedes-Benz 1618K (2005) vs. Mack CV712 (2004)
2 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz 1618K (2005):
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
| Torque measured at | 1600 rev / min and 1300 rev / min | 19 % more or 300 rev |
4 reasons to buy Mack CV712 (2004):
Sizes
| Clearance | 481 mm and 260 mm | 46 % more or 221 mm |
Motor
| Full power | 272.2 kW and 132 kW | 52 % more or 140.2 kW |
| Peak torque | 1672 Nm and 675 Nm | 60 % more or 997 Nm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 8 and 6 | 25 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Chassis total weight | 4400 kg and 5081.1 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3260 mm and 4140 mm |
| Dimensional length | 6015 mm and 6375 mm |
| Length from cab rear to frame end | 4185 mm and 3505 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 1135 mm and 1372 mm |
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 1 and 1 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Mack |
| Model | OM904LA (177 HP) and AI-300A ASET IEGR |
Gear box
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Fuller |
| Model | G60-6 and T309(LR) |
| Low gear ratio | 9.2 :1 and 16.4 :1 |
| Top gear ratio | 1 :1 and 0.76 :1 |