- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tipper/
- Mercedes-Benz 1622 (2005) vs. Mercedes-Benz 2632K (2003)
Mercedes-Benz 1622 (2005) vs. Mercedes-Benz 2632K (2003)
1 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz 1622 (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 1
Turn radius | 7000 mm and 8750 mm | 20 % less or 1750 mm |
4 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz 2632K (2003):
Sizes
Clearance | 257 mm and 210 mm | 18 % more or 47 mm |
Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
Displacement | 12 l. and 4.8 l. | 60 % more or 7.2 l. |
Cylinders number | 12 and 4 | 67 % more or 8 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 1
Length from cab rear to frame end | 5235 mm and 5900 mm |
Length from rear axle center to frame end | 1885 mm and 1350 mm |
Wheelbase | 3560 mm and 3900 mm |
Dimensional length | 7065 mm and 8040 mm |
Total gross vehicle weight | 16000 kg and 25000 kg |
Chassis total weight | 4280 kg and 8200 kg |
Sizes
Height to cab upper part | 2694 mm and 3191 mm |
Tyre size | 305/70R19.5 and 315/80R22.5 |
Class by weight | 8 and 8 |
Motor
Aspiration | Turbocharging with intercooler and Turbocharging with intercooler |
Fuel type | diesel and diesel |
Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Mercedes-Benz |
Model | OM924LA (218 HP) and OM501LA 320 HP |