- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tipper/
- Mercedes-Benz 1628 (2005) vs. Mack CV713 (2004)
Mercedes-Benz 1628 (2005) vs. Mack CV713 (2004)
2 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz 1628 (2005):
Motor
| Torque measured at | 1600 rev / min and 1300 rev / min | 19 % more or 300 rev |
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
5 reasons to buy Mack CV713 (2004):
Sizes
| Clearance | 488 mm and 210 mm | 57 % more or 278 mm |
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
| Full power | 242.4 kW and 208.1 kW | 14 % more or 34.3 kW |
| Peak torque | 1672 Nm and 1100 Nm | 34 % more or 572 Nm |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 10 and 8 | 20 % more or 2 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 1885 mm and 1651 mm |
| Chassis total weight | 4280 kg and 7057 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3560 mm and 6300 mm |
| Dimensional length | 7065 mm and 8817 mm |
| Length from cab rear to frame end | 5235 mm and 4978 mm |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Mack |
| Model | OM906LA (279 HP) and AMI-300 ASET IEGR |
Gear box
| Top gear ratio | 1 :1 and 0.71 :1 |
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Fuller |
| Model | G131-9 and T309 |
| Low gear ratio | 9.5 :1 and 3.5 :1 |