- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tipper/
- Mercedes-Benz 2528L (2004) vs. Mack CXN602 (2004)
Mercedes-Benz 2528L (2004) vs. Mack CXN602 (2004)
1 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz 2528L (2004):
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 | 
1 reasons to buy Mack CXN602 (2004):
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 10 and 8 | 20 % more or 2 | 
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Wheelbase | 4200 mm and 3531 mm | 
| Dimensional length | 8255 mm and 5852 mm | 
| Length from cab rear to frame end | 6160 mm and 2972 mm | 
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 1000 mm and 1041 mm | 
| Chassis total weight | 6460 kg and 5321.1 kg | 
Sizes
| Tyre size | 315/80R22.5 and 295/75R22.5 | 
| Overall width | 2490 mm and 2410 mm | 
| Height to cab upper part | 2987 mm and 2857 mm | 
Gear box
| Model | G131-9 and T310 | 
| Top gear ratio | 1 :1 and 0.75 :1 | 
| Low gear ratio | 9.5 :1 and 14.4 :1 | 
| Manufacturer | Mercedes-Benz and Eaton Fuller |