- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tipper/
- Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005) vs. Iveco AD260S27Y/PS (2004)
Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005) vs. Iveco AD260S27Y/PS (2004)
4 reasons to buy Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7200 mm and 8540 mm | 16 % less or 1340 mm | 
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 6900 mm and 8040 mm | 14 % less or 1140 mm | 
Motor
| Full power | 387.8 kW and 200 kW | 48 % more or 187.8 kW | 
| Displacement | 12.8 l. and 7.8 l. | 39 % more or 5.0 l. | 
1 reasons to buy Iveco AD260S27Y/PS (2004):
Motor
| Torque measured at | 1720 rev / min and 1400 rev / min | 19 % more or 320 rev | 
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Chassis total weight | 7780 kg and 7060 kg | 
| Wheelbase | 4100 mm and 4200 mm | 
| Dimensional length | 6285 mm and 9262 mm | 
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 825 mm and 2117 mm | 
| Total gross vehicle weight | 23400 kg and 26000 kg | 
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Wheelbase | 3900 mm and 3800 mm | 
| Dimensional length | 6085 mm and 8502 mm | 
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 825 mm and 1757 mm | 
| Total gross vehicle weight | 23400 kg and 26000 kg | 
| Chassis total weight | 7690 kg and 6960 kg | 
Sizes
| Overall width | 2495 mm and 2550 mm | 
| Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm and 2965 mm | 
| Rear axles number | 2 and 2 | 
| Tyre size | Front: 295/80R22.5, Rear: 295/80R22.5 and 315/80R22.5 | 
| Class by weight | 8 and 8 | 
Motor
| Hole | 131 mm and 115 mm | 
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Iveco | 
| Strokes | 158 mm and 125 mm | 
| Model | D13A520 (520 HP) and Cursor 8 (200 cm) | 
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 | 
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with intercooler and turbocharging | 
Gear box
| Reverse gears number | 2 and 2 | 
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Eurotronic | 
| Model | V2514 and AS2301 | 
| Forward gears number | 12 and 12 |