- Home/
 - Comparison/
 - Tipper/
 - Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005) vs. Iveco AT260T35 (2005)
 
Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005) vs. Iveco AT260T35 (2005)
4 reasons to buy Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7200 mm and 9200 mm | 22 % less or 2000 mm | 
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 6900 mm and 8725 mm | 21 % less or 1825 mm | 
Motor
| Full power | 298.3 kW and 259 kW | 13 % more or 39.3 kW | 
| Displacement | 12.8 l. and 7.8 l. | 39 % more or 5.0 l. | 
2 reasons to buy Iveco AT260T35 (2005):
Motor
| Torque measured at | 1930 rev / min and 1400 rev / min | 27 % more or 530 rev | 
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 | 
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Wheelbase | 4100 mm and 4200 mm | 
| Dimensional length | 6285 mm and 8190 mm | 
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 825 mm and 1135 mm | 
| Total gross vehicle weight | 23400 kg and 26000 kg | 
| Chassis total weight | 7780 kg and 7945 kg | 
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Wheelbase | 3900 mm and 3820 mm | 
| Total gross vehicle weight | 23400 kg and 26000 kg | 
| Dimensional length | 6085 mm and 8170 mm | 
| Chassis total weight | 7690 kg and 7965 kg | 
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 825 mm and 1495 mm | 
Sizes
| Class by weight | 8 and 8 | 
| Height to cab upper part | 3300 mm and 3045 mm | 
| Rear axles number | 2 and 2 | 
| Tyre size | Front: 295/80R22.5, Rear: 295/80R22.5 and 315/80R22.5 | 
Motor
| Model | D13A400 (400 HP) and Cursor 8 (259 cm) | 
| Cylinders number | 6 and 6 | 
| Hole | 131 mm and 115 mm | 
| Strokes | 158 mm and 125 mm | 
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with intercooler and turbocharging | 
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Iveco | 
Gear box
| Manufacturer | Volvo and ZF | 
| Model | V2514 and 16s 151 | 
| Reverse gears number | 2 and 2 |