- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tipper/
- Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005) vs. Mack CV513 (2004)
Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005) vs. Mack CV513 (2004)
2 reasons to buy Volvo FH 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Motor
| Peak torque | 2000 Nm and 1672 Nm | 16 % more or 328 Nm |
| Torque measured at | 1400 rev / min and 1300 rev / min | 7 % more or 100 rev |
2 reasons to buy Mack CV513 (2004):
Motor
| Full power | 302 kW and 298.3 kW | 1 % more or 3.7 kW |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 18 and 12 | 33 % more or 6 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Wheelbase | 3900 mm and 6300 mm |
| Dimensional length | 6085 mm and 9811 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 825 mm and 2794 mm |
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 2 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Mack |
| Model | D13A520 (520 HP) and AMI-370 ASET IEGR |
Gear box
| Model | V2514 and 4500 RDS R 6-speeds |
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Fuller |