- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tipper/
- Volvo FH16 4x2 (2005) vs. Mercedes-Benz 1844L (2003)
Volvo FH16 4x2 (2005) vs. Mercedes-Benz 1844L (2003)
6 reasons to buy Volvo FH16 4x2 (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7250 mm and 10700 mm | 32 % less or 3450 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 7050 mm and 10250 mm | 31 % less or 3200 mm |
Motor
| Torque measured at | 1500 rev / min and 1080 rev / min | 28 % more or 420 rev |
| Displacement | 16.1 l. and 12 l. | 25 % more or 4.1 l. |
| Full power | 410.1 kW and 324.4 kW | 21 % more or 85.7 kW |
| Peak torque | 2800 Nm and 2100 Nm | 25 % more or 700 Nm |
1 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz 1844L (2003):
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 16 and 12 | 25 % more or 4 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Wheelbase | 3600 mm and 5700 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5785 mm and 9755 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 825 mm and 2350 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 18000 kg and 18000 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 6920 kg and 6710 kg |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Dimensional length | 5685 mm and 9455 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 825 mm and 2350 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 18000 kg and 18000 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 6910 kg and 6710 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3500 mm and 5400 mm |
Sizes
| Class by weight | 8 and 8 |
| Height to cab upper part | 3295 mm and 3495 mm |
| Rear axles number | 1 and 1 |
| Tyre size | Front: 295/80R22.5, Rear: 295/80R22.5 and 315/80R22.5 |
| Overall width | 2495 mm and 2494 mm |
Motor
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with intercooler and Turbocharging with intercooler |
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | D16C (610 HP) and OM501LA (440 HP) |
| Hole | 144 mm and 130 mm |
| Strokes | 165 mm and 150 mm |
Gear box
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | V2814 and G211-16 |
| Reverse gears number | 2 and 2 |