- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tipper/
- Volvo FH16 4x2 (2005) vs. Mercedes-Benz 2632K (2003)
Volvo FH16 4x2 (2005) vs. Mercedes-Benz 2632K (2003)
2 reasons to buy Volvo FH16 4x2 (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 7050 mm and 8750 mm | 19 % less or 1700 mm |
Motor
| Displacement | 16.1 l. and 12 l. | 25 % more or 4.1 l. |
1 reasons to buy Mercedes-Benz 2632K (2003):
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Chassis total weight | 6910 kg and 8200 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3500 mm and 3900 mm |
| Dimensional length | 5685 mm and 8040 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 825 mm and 1350 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 18000 kg and 25000 kg |
Sizes
| Overall width | 2495 mm and 2490 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3295 mm and 3191 mm |
| Tyre size | Front: 295/80R22.5, Rear: 295/80R22.5 and 315/80R22.5 |
| Class by weight | 8 and 8 |
Motor
| Aspiration | Turbocharging with intercooler and Turbocharging with intercooler |
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | D16C (550 HP) and OM501LA 320 HP |