- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tipper/
- Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005) vs. International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004)
Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005) vs. International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004)
5 reasons to buy Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Turn radius | 7450 mm and 7671.8 mm | 3 % less or 221.8 mm |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Turn radius | 7200 mm and 7491 mm | 4 % less or 291 mm |
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 1 | 50 % more or 1 |
Motor
| Peak torque | 2500 Nm and 1423.6 Nm | 43 % more or 1076.4 Nm |
| Full power | 410.1 kW and 249.8 kW | 39 % more or 160.3 kW |
1 reasons to buy International 9200i SBA 4x2 (2004):
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 18 and 12 | 33 % more or 6 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 2
| Chassis total weight | 8580 kg and 4950.1 kg |
| Wheelbase | 3200 mm and 3657.6 mm |
| Dimensional length | 6735 mm and 5613.4 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 805 mm and 787.4 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 26000 kg and 14515 kg |
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Dimensional length | 6585 mm and 5511.8 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3050 mm and 3556 mm |
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 805 mm and 787 mm |
| Total gross vehicle weight | 26000 kg and 14515 kg |
| Chassis total weight | 8570 kg and 4945.1 kg |
Sizes
| Class by weight | 8 and 7 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Caterpillar |
| Model | D16C (550 HP) and C12 (335 HP) |
Gear box
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Eaton Fuller |
| Model | VO2814 and FR-13210B 18-speeds |