- Home/
- Comparison/
- Tipper/
- Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005) vs. Mack CV513 (2004)
Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005) vs. Mack CV513 (2004)
3 reasons to buy Volvo FH16 6x2 Supporting Rear Axle (2005):
Motor
| Torque measured at | 1500 rev / min and 1300 rev / min | 13 % more or 200 rev |
| Peak torque | 2500 Nm and 1672 Nm | 33 % more or 828 Nm |
| Full power | 410.1 kW and 242.4 kW | 41 % more or 167.7 kW |
1 reasons to buy Mack CV513 (2004):
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 18 and 12 | 33 % more or 6 |
Neutral reasons:
Wheelbase specifications 1
| Length from rear axle center to frame end | 805 mm and 2794 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3050 mm and 6300 mm |
| Dimensional length | 6585 mm and 9811 mm |
Sizes
| Rear axles number | 2 and 2 |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Mack |
| Model | D16C (610 HP) and AMI-300 ASET IEGR |
Gear box
| Manufacturer | Volvo and Fuller |
| Model | VO2814 and T309 |