- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Caterpillar 825C vs. Ingersoll Rand SD116F
Caterpillar 825C vs. Ingersoll Rand SD116F
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 825C:
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 589 l. and 257 l. | 56 % more or 332 l. |
Motor
| Full power | 234.9 kW and 115.6 kW | 51 % more or 119.3 kW |
Gear box
| Forward gears number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
| Reverse gears number | 4 and 2 | 50 % more or 2 |
1 reasons to buy Ingersoll Rand SD116F:
Sizes
| Clearance | 483 mm and 234 mm | 52 % more or 249 mm |
Neutral reasons:
Wheels
| Front wheels roller width | 1118 mm and 2134 mm |
| Front wheels roller diameter | 1290 mm and 1295 mm |
Sizes
| Length with blade on ground level | 7690 mm and 5895 mm |
| Width between wheels | 3650 mm and 2286 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3910 mm and 3146 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3530 mm and 3100 mm |
Operation
| Working weight | 32400 kg and 11360 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | 3406 and QSB5.9-30T |
Images
Sizes
| 4. Wheelbase | 3530 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3100 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 234 mm | 5. Clearance | 483 mm |
| 1. Length with blade on ground level | 7690 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 5895 mm |
| 2. Width between wheels | 3650 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 2286 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3910 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3146 mm |