- Home/
- Comparison/
- Roller-Compactor/
- Caterpillar 826C vs. Dynapac CT260
Caterpillar 826C vs. Dynapac CT260
4 reasons to buy Caterpillar 826C:
Sizes
| Clearance | 505 mm and 430 mm | 15 % more or 75 mm |
Operation
| Fuel Capacity | 600 l. and 400 l. | 33 % more or 200 l. |
Motor
| Effective power | 234.9 kW and 156.6 kW | 33 % more or 78.3 kW |
Gear box
| Maximum speed | 32.5 km/h and 22.4 km/h | 31 % more or 10.1 km/h |
1 reasons to buy Dynapac CT260:
Motor
| Power measured at | 2200 rev / min and 2100 rev / min | 5 % more or 100 rev |
Neutral reasons:
Wheels
| Front wheels roller width | 1200 mm and 1 mm |
| Front wheels roller diameter | 1525 mm and 1.5 mm |
| Rear wheels roller width | 1200 mm and 1 mm |
| Rear wheels roller diameter | 1525 mm and 1.5 mm |
Sizes
| Length with blade on ground level | 7718 mm and 3.6 mm |
| Width between wheels | 3800 mm and 853 mm |
| Height to cab upper part | 3987 mm and 3518 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3530 mm and 3250 mm |
Operation
| Operating voltage | 24 V and 12 V |
| Working weight | 31630 kg and 21400 kg |
Motor
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar and Cummins |
| Model | 3406 and 6CT8.3 |
| Aspiration | turbocharging and natural aspiration |
Gear box
| Transmission type | Cat. planetary powershift transmission and twin disc |
| Forward gears number | 4 and 4 |
| Reverse gears number | 4 and 4 |
Blades
| Width | 4470 mm and 853 mm |
Images
Sizes
| 1. Length with blade on ground level | 7718 mm | 1. Length with blade on ground level | 3.6 mm |
| 2. Width between wheels | 3800 mm | 2. Width between wheels | 853 mm |
| 3. Height to cab upper part | 3987 mm | 3. Height to cab upper part | 3518 mm |
| 4. Wheelbase | 3530 mm | 4. Wheelbase | 3250 mm |
| 5. Clearance | 505 mm | 5. Clearance | 430 mm |